Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3719 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-2600S - 128 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-2600S - $78.96 vs $171.83
- Up to 60% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-2600S - $0.68 vs $1.7 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2451 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €87.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2460 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
583
29.72972972972973%
Multi-Core
1811
23.803890641430073%
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |