Buy on Amazon
€190.73
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3719 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 23% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-2600S - 564 vs 459 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-2600S - $59.66 vs $171.83
- Up to 71% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-2600S - $0.12 vs $0.42 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
459
81.38297872340425%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
28.57142857142857%
Price, €
€190.73
34%
Intel Core i7-2600S Quad-Core Processor 2.8 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72600S
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
564
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105F 4-Core Comet Lake Processor 3.70GHz 8GT/s 6MB LGA 1200 CPU Retail
Buy for €66.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
583
40.09628610729023%
Multi-Core
1811
40.49642218246869%
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.