Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 3474 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $171.83 vs $1517.23
- Up to 84% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $1.4 vs $8.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 43% better in War Thunder than Core i7-2600S - 195 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 64 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
136
69%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€190.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12295 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.64/FPS
16%
Price, €
€1684.12
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,684.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12304 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |