Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 3393 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Core i7-2600S - 277 vs 256 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-2600S - $61.93 vs $171.83
- Up to 67% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-2600S - $0.25 vs $0.75 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
256
92.4187725631769%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
33.33333333333333%
Price, €
€190.73
36%
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
277
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €68.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
583
39.4185260311021%
Multi-Core
1811
35.64259004133044%
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |