Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600S outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600S is 596 days older than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-4130 - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-2600S - $38.04 vs $171.83
- Up to 78% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-2600S - $0.33 vs $1.49 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.49/FPS
22.14765100671141%
Price, €
€190.73
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2510 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
127
99.21875%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2511 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |