Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4747 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $62.15 vs $386.79
- Up to 82% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-14900F - $0.46 vs $2.56 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-2600K - 168 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 32 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
151
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.56/FPS
17%
Price, €
€429.34
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €429.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |