Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 2186 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-2600K - 170 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - $51.18 vs $62.15
- Up to 25% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-2600K - $0.33 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18065 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18066 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |