Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 1696 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G3900 - 160 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - $29.18 vs $62.15
- Up to 53% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-2600K - $0.2 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 51 vs 95 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |