Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-2600K outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-2600K is 841 days older than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than FX-6350 - 163 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than FX-6350 - $62.15 vs $73.12
- Up to 19% better value when playing Rust than FX-6350 - $0.42 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |