Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600 is 2186 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G3930 - 277 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-2600 - $71.68 vs $168.14
- Up to 57% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-2600 - $0.29 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 51 vs 95 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €186.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2181 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
276
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |