Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600 is 694 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1610 - 193 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-2600 - $27.05 vs $108.05
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 55 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €119.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74986 minutes ago
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74986 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
69.6078431372549%
Multi-Core
739
35.978578383641675%
Intel Core i7-2600 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |