Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 2420 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 62% better in Starfield than Ryzen 7 1700 - 84 vs 52 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 28 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $158.27 vs $269.95
- Up to 5% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-14700K - $3.38 vs $3.57 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.57/FPS
95%
Price, €
€299.65
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
52
62%
Value, €/FPS
€3.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€175.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €175.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-14700K | vs | Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |