Buy on Amazon
€262.59
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $359
Availability
MSRP in USD: $359
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 23% better in Minecraft than Core i5-10400 - 873 vs 709 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 28 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $90.37 vs $236.57
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i7-14700F Desktop Processor 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) up to 5.4 GHz
Buy for €262.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74962 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-10400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.3 GHz LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110400
Buy for €100.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74964 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1430
51.53153153153153%
Multi-Core
5489
31.669743826448187%
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 6 |
28 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.