Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700 is 2631 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700
- Performs up to 27% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 131 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 78% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $258.69 vs $1166.95
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700 - 44 vs 28 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €287.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76361 minutes ago
Buy for €1,295.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76362 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
43.21441706509746%
Multi-Core
9619
58.609553984889104%
Intel Core i7-14700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 22 |
28 | Threads | 44 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 145 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |