Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700 is 4509 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G540 - 216 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 28 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i7-14700 - $14.07 vs $233.97
- Up to 92% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-14700 - $0.09 vs $1.2 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €259.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3732 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
167
77.31481481481481%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€15.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €15.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3720 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
14.564178006620082%
Multi-Core
679
4.137216670728735%
Intel Core i7-14700 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |