Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3071 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4150 - 229 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $21.73 vs $241.25
- Up to 90% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-13700K - $0.12 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
10%
Price, €
€267.79
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €267.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
199
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |