Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-12700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-12700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 365 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-12700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-12700F - 215 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $182.79 vs $278.58
- Up to 32% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-13700F - $0.98 vs $1.44 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
68%
Price, €
€309.22
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €309.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €202.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |