Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-7600 - 206 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $70.17 vs $213.74
- Up to 61% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-13700F - $0.45 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
39.130434782608695%
Price, €
€237.25
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €237.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1591 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
174
84.46601941747572%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1584 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1373
51.597143930853065%
Multi-Core
3812
24.633279483037157%
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |