Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F and the cheaper Core i5-13400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-13400 - 136 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $147.22 vs $213.74
- Up to 28% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-13700F - $1.25 vs $1.74 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
71.83908045977012%
Price, €
€237.25
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for €237.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1805 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
96.32352941176471%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€163.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €163.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1805 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Single-Core
2287
85.94513340849305%
Multi-Core
10364
66.97253634894992%
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |