Buy on Amazon
€294.89
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $384
Availability
MSRP in USD: $384
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 15% better in Fortnite than FX-8320 - 243 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - $54.71 vs $265.67
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Core I7-13700 Processor 13th Generation LGA 1700 BX8071513700 *
Buy for €294.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75252 minutes ago
LANCHY AMD FX-Series FX-8320 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for €60.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-13700
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.