Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-12700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-12700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 795 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-12700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700K
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $151.64 vs $375.08
- Up to 60% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-14900F - $0.7 vs $1.73 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-12700K - 241 vs 240 FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€168.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €168.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
241
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
40%
Price, €
€416.34
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €416.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |