Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 2866 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i5-4460T - 206 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $38.66 vs $182.79
- Up to 79% better value when playing Control than Core i7-12700F - $0.21 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €202.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15436 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
200
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15436 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |