Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3047 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4130 - 208 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $30.07 vs $182.79
- Up to 81% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-12700F - $0.19 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €202.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15723 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
179
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15724 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |