Buy on Amazon
€202.09
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $324
Availability
MSRP in USD: $324
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 2956 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 24% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1820 - 461 vs 372 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $33.94 vs $182.06
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel CPU Core i7-12700F / 12/20 / 2.1GHz / 6xxChipset / BX8071512700F
Buy for €202.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76533 minutes ago
Intel CPU BX80646G1820 Celeron G1820 2.70GHz 2M LGA1150 2C/2T Haswell
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76532 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-12700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
20.787468247248096%
Multi-Core
825
7.157109395332697%
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.