Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 2031 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 140 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 45 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-11800H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11800H | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 80 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
