Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700KF is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 196 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-11700KF - $99.89 vs $180.72
- Up to 35% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i7-11700KF - $0.66 vs $1.02 per FPS
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
64%
Price, €
€200.6
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €200.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2418 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
167
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2419 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |