Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700K and the cheaper Core i9-11900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900F - 195 vs 194 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-11700K - $153.55 vs $188.65
- Up to 18% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-11700K - $0.88 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
82%
Price, €
€209.4
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for €209.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18936 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18936 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |