Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-11700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-11700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-11700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $189.37 vs $386.79
- Up to 45% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900F - $1.09 vs $1.99 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-11700F - 216 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
88%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€210.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €210.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.99/FPS
54%
Price, €
€429.34
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €429.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |