Buy on Amazon
€211.76
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3431 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 33% better in Dota 2 than Core i7-2700K - 233 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $65.07 vs $190.77
- Up to 55% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i7-11700F - $0.41 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Core i7-11700F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
233
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
45%
Price, €
€211.76
34%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-11700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.9 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €211.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 327 minutes ago
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
175
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.23
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-2700K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72700K
Buy for €72.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 327 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Core i7-11700F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.