Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3894 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 32% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-760 - 143 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $73.12 vs $176.95
- Up to 45% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-11700F - $0.75 vs $1.37 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
54%
Price, €
€196.41
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €196.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
108
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |