Buy on Amazon
€210.2
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 27% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-4130 - 647 vs 508 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $30.42 vs $189.37
- Up to 78% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-11700F - $0.07 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-11700F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
647
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
21%
Price, €
€210.2
16%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-11700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.9 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €210.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
508
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.77
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4130 3.4 3 FCLGA 1150 Processor BX80646I34130
Buy for €33.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-11700F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.