Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700 is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700
- Performs up to 15% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 124 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i7-11700 - $99.89 vs $161.21
- Up to 28% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-11700 - $1.03 vs $1.44 per FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
71%
Price, €
€178.94
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €178.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9062 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
108
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €110.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9063 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |