Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 41% better in War Thunder than Core i7-3770 - 198 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $69.47 vs $157.2
- Up to 37% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-10700KF - $0.55 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
62%
Price, €
€174.49
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €174.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
140
70%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |