Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2181 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Starfield than Core i5-4460 - 63 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $40.22 vs $157.2
- Up to 70% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-10700KF - $0.84 vs $2.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.77/FPS
30%
Price, €
€174.49
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €174.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
53
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €44.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |