Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-7100T - 193 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $35.17 vs $157.2
- Up to 76% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700KF - $0.22 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
24%
Price, €
€174.49
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €174.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
181
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |