Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Remnant II than Athlon 3000G - 91 vs 83 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $38.36 vs $157.2
- Up to 73% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i7-10700KF - $0.51 vs $1.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
91
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
26%
Price, €
€174.49
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €174.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
83
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |