Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $176.22 vs $330.37
- Up to 36% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900KF - $1.43 vs $2.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700K - 163 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700K - 32 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
84%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€195.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €195.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.25/FPS
63%
Price, €
€366.71
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €366.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |