Buy on Amazon
€186.68
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K and the cheaper Core i9-10900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 1% better in FIFA 23 than Core i9-10900F - 183 vs 181 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $164.51 vs $168.18
- Up to 1% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-10700K - $1.01 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
99%
Price, €
€186.68
97%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)
Buy for €186.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17966 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.61
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €182.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17966 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.