Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 47% better in War Thunder than Core i5-2400 - 198 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $25.56 vs $168.18
- Up to 78% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-10700K - $0.21 vs $0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
22%
Price, €
€186.68
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €186.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18242 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
135
68%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €28.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18242 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |