Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 8% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-4150 - 275 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $32.9 vs $168.18
- Up to 79% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-10700K - $0.14 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
275
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
20%
Price, €
€186.68
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €186.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7405 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
255
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€36.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €36.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |