Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3240 - 193 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $29.98 vs $168.18
- Up to 79% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700K - $0.2 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
20%
Price, €
€186.68
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €186.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16029 minutes ago
Buy for €33.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16029 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |