Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 67% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1610 - 242 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $27.05 vs $168.18
- Up to 73% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-10700K - $0.21 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
242
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
27%
Price, €
€186.68
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €186.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16844 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
145
59%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16843 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |