Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 7 2700X - 250 vs 234 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $153.55 vs $168.18
- Up to 3% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-10700K - $0.73 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
250
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
97%
Price, €
€186.68
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for €186.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15400 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
234
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |