Buy on Amazon
€170.43
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Escape From Tarkov than Pentium G4400 - 212 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $19.92 vs $153.54
- Up to 86% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-10700F - $0.11 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
13%
Price, €
€170.43
12%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €170.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
193
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.11
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4400 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 3.3 GHz 54W LGA1151
Buy for €22.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Pentium |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.