Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $147.69 vs $197.42
- Up to 16% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-11900K - $0.76 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-10700F - 244 vs 216 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
216
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€163.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €163.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78252 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
244
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
84%
Price, €
€219.14
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |