Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3090 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 54% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-3960X - 126 vs 82 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - $163.78 vs $255.92
- Up to 58% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-3960X - $1.44 vs $3.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3960X - 16 vs 12 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
126
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€181.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €181.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7216 minutes ago
Buy for €284.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |