Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3111 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-2700K - 272 vs 242 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $65.07 vs $147.69
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €163.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75072 minutes ago
Buy for €72.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75071 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Single-Core
664
41.19106699751861%
Multi-Core
2264
31.30963905407274%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |