Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-7500 - 393 vs 345 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $65.07 vs $160.13
- Up to 53% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-10700F - $0.21 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
393
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
46%
Price, €
€177.74
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €177.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
345
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-7500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |