Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4590.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4590 - 191 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4590 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $57.77 vs $155.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - $0.35 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
38%
Price, €
€172.05
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €172.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
181
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-4590 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |