Buy on Amazon
€170.44
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2433 days newer than Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-4330 - 190 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1066
66.12903225806451%
Multi-Core
2144
29.650117549439912%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i3-4330 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.